JH: Showing and not telling is a core aspect of writing, but sometimes telling is actually better for the story. Swati Teerdhala shares thoughts on when it's okay--and preferable--to tell and not show. 

Swati Teerdhala is the author of the upcoming novel, The Tiger at Midnight, the first in a trilogy. After graduating from the University of Virginia with a B.S. in Finance and History, she tumbled into the marketing side of the technology industry. She’s passionate about many things, including how to make a proper cup of chai, the right ratio of curd-to-crust in a lemon tart, and diverse representation in the stories we tell. She currently lives in New York City and can be found wandering the streets with a pen or camera in hand.One of the most common writing adages is “show, don’t tell”. It’s often used to solve almost any narrative or prose problem, but sometimes it can do more harm than good. Recently, while doing revisions on a new book, I realized that my beginning wasn’t as tight as it could be. A lot of the issues I had with my story's beginning, where I was introducing my characters and my world, was from a lack of clarity. As I dove into figuring out how to solve that problem and flipped through my numerous craft books and notes, I realized something.Sometimes, it's ok to tell rather than show, especially when it’s actually important to tell your readers the information they need.Anything that will provide a basis of understanding your story, like who the reigning monarch is and that there are three moons that control magic, can be told. If it’s vital knowledge for the reader to have to understand the world, then it’s important to be as clear as possible about the information. Otherwise, the narrative can become confusing and difficult to follow for readers. In these instances, showing can further muddle the narrative, resulting in confusion for readers. Losing vital information in extended metaphors and half answers only makes the narrative frustrating.Think about the books you’ve put away because you couldn’t get into the world or were too confused to continue reading. Would some simple telling have solved the issue? Oftentimes, laying the groundwork with a simple summary of the facts can allow your prose to shine.Other times when telling is more valuable than showing is when you’re introducing smaller characters, when you’re showing the passage of time, and transition scenes.These instances don’t require as much showing because they’re often not character related or dynamic, but rather show more static parts of the story like backstory. Even with more dynamic story elements, like describing an internal emotional state, showing can be mixed with telling to create a fully realized moment. The beauty of prose is that we can dive into a character’s head and understand them. That’s not something you can do with film or TV shows. It’s something unique to novels and to narrative. There’s power in putting us in a character’s head and looking through their eyes.Of course, this doesn’t always apply. Character emotions? Show us that. Make us feel every feel and truly understand what the character is going through internally by putting us in that exact moment. Telling us how a character feels can’t evoke the same response and understanding as putting us in the situation alongside them.The one caveat with telling is that using it too much can result in a book that is more narrative and summary than a story. Modern fiction tends to be more visual and many readers want to be able to see themselves in the story that is happening. Showing is a great tool for making a story that allows for a reader to dive in.But as you’re introducing your readers to a new world, some good, old fashioned telling can add clarity and allow your readers to instead spend that time falling in love with your story.